Ecat Third Party Test Results

“Even by the most conservative assumptions as to the errors in the measurements, the result is still one order of magnitude greater than conventional energy sources.” — Report Abstract

“The results obtained indicate that energy was produced in decidedly higher quantities than what may be gained from any conventional source.” — Report Conclusion

With the results now published, what happens next?  How independent are the familiar names of the authors?  What is the margin of error?  Does this really prove anything?

Read the Full Report and decide for yourself.

Authors: Giuseppe Levi
Bologna University, Bologna, Italy;
Evelyn Foschi
Bologna, Italy;
Torbjörn Hartman, Bo Höistad,
Roland Pettersson and
Lars Tegnér
Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden;
Hanno Essén
Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, Sweden


One thought on “Ecat Third Party Test Results


    arXiv debunk by Swedish physicists of the Blind Mice report.
    An extract from the conclusion:

    “We are surprised that the authors make such remarkable claims based on a report with so many shortcomings. We also find that much attention is drawn to trivialities while important pieces of information and investigation are lacking and seem not to have been conducted and considered. Wishful thinking seems to have replaced scientific rigor in some cases. These are characteristics more typically found in pseudo‐scientific texts and have no place in a technical/scientific report on this level. Therefore, it seems clear to us that a truly independent and scientific investigation of the so called E‐Cat device is still pending. Thus, we do not think that a convincing demonstration of “anomalous heat energy production” has been presented in the arXiv report, or anywhere else to date.”

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *